Update and a joke

Looking back over the past few months of this blog I was struck by my paucity of posting… I’ve had a plenty of ideas for post and played plenty of games I could have blogged about but I find if I don’t take action straight away it gets pushed to the back of my mind. Being busy with uni work has meant that my concentration for writing has been saved for that (seemed more important)… so much writing in fact that I fail to find this joke as funny as I probably should:

“Q: How many historians does it take to change a light bulb?
Posted on March 17, 2011

A: There is a great deal of debate on this issue. Up until the mid-20th century, the accepted answer was ‘one’: and this Whiggish narrative underpinned a number of works that celebrated electrification and the march of progress in light-bulb changing. Beginning in the 1960s, however, social historians increasingly rejected the ‘Great Man’ school and produced revisionist narratives that stressed the contributions of research assistants and custodial staff. This new consensus was challenged, in turn, by women’s historians, who criticized the social interpretation for marginalizing women, and who argued that light bulbs are actually changed by department secretaries. Since the 1980s, however, postmodernist scholars have deconstructed what they characterize as a repressive hegemonic discourse of light-bulb changing, with its implicit binary opposition between ‘light’ and ‘darkness,’ and its phallogocentric privileging of the bulb over the socket, which they see as colonialist, sexist, and racist. Finally, a new generation of neo-conservative historians have concluded that the light never needed changing in the first place, and have praised political leaders like Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher for bringing back the old bulb. Clearly, much additional research remains to be done.”

From here: https://thedispersalofdarwin.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/q-how-many-historians-does-it-take-to-change-a-light-bulb/

As I’ve been doing the prep work on my dissertation it is all too familiar to my recent output… On a related note I’m torn whether to game parts of my dissertation, would it spoil things or would it give me extra insights or would it just be a distraction best left for afterwards… I’m tending towards the latter. Any input form anyone who has been there before would be grateful.



2015- a few project ideas

Looking back on my plans from this time last year I can see that I only achieved one of those goals and that was only in the final week of 2014… still I consider those projects still on the go. However some new things have caught my interest….

Firstly I’ve really enjoyed both painting and gaming with the Gladiator figures so I think I will get a few more ancients figures for some skirmish games, no more than 20 a side to keep it simple. I’m drawn to Thracians as they are my favourite tribe and they have plenty of potential for gaming scenarios. Will pick up them and some Celts first probably.

Secondly I’d like to play in more campaigns. The Gladiator one was great fun and I’m keen to start the Ludos one (previously we only played a single gladiator). I’m running a PBEM WW2 game for Brian and Evan and hope to do some more in the future- possibly with other people too.

Thirdly I’d like to do more SF gaming- quite what and how remains to be seen, probably skirmish games possibly RPG, I’ve always had a fondness for the Post Apocalyptic genre but I seem to be revisiting the Cyberpunk literature of my teenage years so maybe something along those lines.

That should keep me going for a while. See what I pick up when I sell some old stuff and visit the forthcoming shows.



2014 End of year Progress Report.

In 2014 I painted, 463 20mm figures, 30 28mm figures, 28 54mm figures, 61 20mm kits, 4 3mm (1/600th) Aircraft and read 122 books.

Apart from the number of 20mm figures painted everything is up from last year. I had wanted to do more but more importantly I started an MA so that took precedence.

I’ll start counting for next year….